Myanmar | person
Based on 9 claims made by 3 sources, held 4 positions.
Calculating the relationships between units during this career establishes that was part of 37 inferred chains of command. These calculated chains of command are drawn from a total of 0 subordinate units over the span of this personβs career.
An incident is a public claim made by a civil society organization, an international organization, a government, or another source that a violation of human rights was perpetrated by the defense and security forces of a country. Graph analysis can generate linkages based on the dates and locations between these incidents and chains of command. The Security Force Monitor does not make allegations and nothing in this platform should be taken as the Monitor making an allegation against a unit or person.
According to sources there are 0 incidents which name as a perpetrator, as well as 0 incidents which name a subordinate as the perpetrator. Additionally, 0 incidents happened the areas of operation of a unit under their command.
on this page
Positions Held
Sources establish that held 4 positions through their career. The time period these positions were held was inferred from 9 claims made by 3 sources.
Subordinate units
A total of 41 units were subordinate to units commanded by over their career. This includes all subordinate units which fell directly under as well as those that had intermediary superiors before ultimately falling under .
The list of subordinate units during βs career found below was generated by using graph analysis on all claims made by sources.
Chains of Command
Sources establish claims about the chain of command, commanders, the sites and areas of operations of units, and incidents through time. Security Force Monitor organizes these claims into structured data. The linkages in time between these claims time-bound periods are inferred according to the Monitorβs methodology. Individual time-bound chains of command can be generated from this data using graph analysis.
Every chain of command which included is shown below. These chains are disaggregated to show the entire time-range of each chain from the lowest unit in the chain to the highest unit at the top of the chain. Any individual who was part of that chain during the date-range is shown as well.
The chains show any direct or positional incidents which are claimed to have occurred during the time-range. Direct incidents have a source which directly names the unit as a perpetrator. Positional incidents occur when there is an intersection between claims from sources alleging an incident occurred and other sources giving a unit an overlapping location and date-range.
The following chains include . Click on a chain to see our inferred time periods as well as every source used to establish the chain of command.
Incidents
can be connected to 0 incidents alleged to subordinate units through the chain of command. Additionally, 0 incidents occurred in locations where commanded a unit active in an overlapping location at that time.
Claims & Sources
Sources and claims connected to 's held positions and personal information are listed below.
| claim/status | accepted |
| assertion/person:names | Myo Win |
| claim/status | accepted |
| assertion/posting:roles | Commander |
| assertion/posting:ranks | Major General |
| claim/status | accepted |
| assertion/posting:roles | Commander |
| assertion/posting:ranks | Brigadier General |
| claim/status | accepted |
| assertion/person:names | Myo Win |
| claim/status | accepted |
| assertion/posting:roles | Commander |
| assertion/posting:ranks | Brigadier General |
| claim/status | accepted |
| assertion/person:names | Myo Win |
| claim/status | accepted |
| claim/status | accepted |
| assertion/posting:roles | Commander |
| assertion/posting:ranks | Major General |
| claim/status | accepted |
| assertion/posting:roles | Commander |
| assertion/posting:ranks | Major General |